My earnings history

I have to earn 7K so that my car comes for free!

 

Earning History:

Friday, 8 May 2026 - Uber Eats (11 trips) - 141.81 AUD (time: 6hr 33m, online 5h 9m) 

Saturday, 9 May 2026 - Uber Eats (4 trips) - 47.67 AUD (time: 2hr 22m, online 1hr 32m) 

Sunday, 10 May 2026 - Uber Eats (7 trips) - 95.66 AUD (time 3hr 46m, online 2h 13m) 

Tuesday, 12 May 2026 - Uber Eats (16 trips) - 197.60 AUD (time 9hr 17m, online 6h 9m) + 7.50 AUD (fuel)

Thursday, 14 May 2026 - Uber Eats (17 trips) - 130.54 AUD (online 7th 20m)  

---

SUM: $620.78 AUD

 

GOT MY FIRST EVER CAR! SELF-BIRTHDAY-GIFT, 27 YEARS SPECIAL! 2007 MAZDA 3 SP23 2.3L Auto

I just got my first ever car.

 

2007 (BK) Mazda 3 SP23, 2.3L engine, 5 speed automatic transmission, metallic grey. 

 

I bought it for the price 6999 AUD (drive-away) from the dealer.

It is neither steal or overprice. The ideal, fair, good point. 

It had 148.800 km odometer when I bought it. I will probably hit 150.000 km in 2 weeks. That's the maximum odometer one should buy a car in my opinion. 150.000 km is the sweet spot. Lower, of course, better.

 

About the car. The car is old, almost 20 years old. But it is looking good. It has sports engine, 2.3L, it is really powerful for the chase and size and weight (154 horsepower), but it means it is a bit thirsty. I am averaging exactly 10.0L per 100 km so far, which is fine. Not great, not terrible. It has leather interior. It has 4 BOSE speakers, one in each door. Sound quality is good. It has "cruise control", which I didn't really expect it to have. It is an amazing tool to use in the annoying Victoria roads which is extremely sensitive and cautious about the traffic rules. I am not intending to pay any of those crazy traffic violation penalties, like 500 AUD or something. So, I set my cruise control on and set the speed at 59 km on 60 road and try to enjoy the ride. 

It is sedan, but it is not too long to worry about parking etc. It has the perfect size to me.

 

I am putting U91 petrol in it. 

 

The fuel history as below:

08 April 2026 - 28.36L U91 - paid 60.55 AUD (got 2.52 AUD discount) - at 148.810 km

19 April 2026 - 26.50L U91 - paid 52.92 AUD (got 0.00 AUD discount) - at 149.070 km

28 April 2026 - 12.45L U91 - paid 15.70 AUD (got 6.30 AUD discount) - at 149.183 km

09 May 2026 - 31.01L U91 - paid 52.93 AUD (got 2.79 AUD discount) - at 149.500 km

14 May 2026 - 32.76L U91 - paid 54.03 AUD (got 2.66 AUD discount) - at 149.815 km

---

SUM: 36 days — 131.08 L bought — paid $236.13 — got $14.27 discount — driven 1.005 km

 

 

 

 

What does it mean for a species to audit its gods? Omittoism

What does it mean for a species to audit its gods? It means, at minimum, that the species has reached the point at which it applies its own best thinking to all authority claims rather than exempting any category of claim from rational evaluation. This is not arrogance. The recognition that one does not know whether God exists, and that one’s own reason is fallible, is not arrogance but intellectual honesty. It is not hostility. The refusal to grant authority without demonstrated legitimacy is the same principle that animates every constitutional democracy’s relationship to its own governments. It is not nihilism. The affirmation of autonomy as a foundational value is, as Camus demonstrates, an affirmation of value, not its denial. It is not impiety. The concept of consentheism—reflective, voluntary, evaluatively grounded religious commitment—is not the framework’s concession to religion but its highest account of what genuine religious commitment looks like when freed from existential coercion. 

 

Omittoist framework illuminates dimensions of different thinkers’ work that their own preoccupations prevented them from exploring—Locke’s consent principle applied beyond its intended domain, Hume’s is-ought gap deployed as a jurisdictional firewall, Arendt’s power-authority-violence distinction deployed as a governance audit. The synthesis that emerges from this mutual pressure is a contribution to the ongoing project of human moral self-understanding—the project, pursued across millennia and across cultures, of figuring out what is owed to one another, what authority any being possesses over rational agents, and what it means to live as finite, morally serious creatures in an uncertain cosmos. 

 

The Omittoist declaration—‘no master is recognised absent demonstrable legitimacy’—is not a declaration of war but a declaration of philosophical seriousness. It is the refusal to settle for less than what the best available principles require. It holds that the same standards routinely applied to human authority claims—consent, accountability, proportionality, transparency—apply without exemption to cosmic authority claims, and that applying them is not an act of rebellion but an act of consistency. As such, it represents not the end of the conversation about divine authority but one of its most rigorous and productive contributions—opening a space of inquiry that political philosophy has been slow to occupy, and inviting all who are committed to the principles of legitimate authority to follow that commitment wherever, consistently, it leads.

Omittoist Philosophers

Here is the list of TOP20 "most" Omittoist philosophers and why:

Rank	Philosopher	Score	Interest Area	Why they are Essential to Omittoism
1	A. John Simmons	99.4	Political Philosophy	He provides the "absolute backbone" of the Constraint of Consent. His rejection of "tacit consent" proves that just living in the universe is not a signature of servitude.
2	Mikhail Bakunin	98.5	Anarchism	His "God and the State" is the primary historical precedent for Jurisdictional Severance. He argued that if God exists, man is a slave; therefore, God must be abolished.
3	Philip Pettit	97.8	Political Theory	His theory of Non-Domination is the perfect twin of the Sovereign Self. It asserts that freedom is the absence of a "master," even a benevolent one.
4	James P. Sterba	96.9	Philosophy of Religion	His logical proofs on the incompatibility of God with horrendous evil are the direct source of the Foreknowledge Liability Clause.
5	Stephen Law	95.5	Analytic Philosophy	His "Evil God Challenge" provides the exact methodology for the Cosmic Audit. It tests whether a deity's character meets the standards of legitimate governance.
6	John Locke	94.2	Political Theory	The "father" of the Jurisdictional Turn. He moved authority from "Divine Right" to the Consent of the Governed.
7	Immanuel Kant	93.1	Ethics	He defined the self as its own legislator (Autonomy). This provides the moral basis for rejecting all un-consented external commands.
8	John Rawls	92.6	Political Philosophy	His Public Reason Requirement is the heart of Omittoist policy. It demands that laws be accessible to all, not based on private revelation.
9	Peter Singer	91.4	Practical Ethics	Directly cited for grounding moral obligation in the Axiom of Shared Vulnerability (sentience) rather than divine command.
10	Michael Huemer	90.3	Political Philosophy	Uses "commonsense" to prove that divine governance would be considered "monstrous" or "malpractice" if performed by a human.
11	David Hume	89.5	Empiricism	His Dialogues represent the first rigorous audit of the "Architect's" Engineering Competence.
12	Albert Camus	88.2	Absurdism	His transition from the "Absurd" to "Revolt" mirrors the path of the Philosophical Orphan.
13	Judith Butler	87.7	Continental Philosophy	Her work on how power "forms" subjects is the tool for the Exodus from divine subjection.
14	Erik Wielenberg	86.4	Ethics	Proves that moral facts are "mind-independent" and do not require a "Vertical Covenant" or God to be binding.
15	Elizabeth Anderson	85.9	Social Philosophy	Her critique of arbitrary hierarchy is the social heart of the Bio-Social Contract.
16	Epicurus	84.5	Ancient Philosophy	The Original Auditor. He formalized the trilemma of evil that makes the "Sovereign God" a moral impossibility.
17	Christine Korsgaard	83.1	Ethics	Argues that authority must flow from the Internal Self and reflective endorsement, not external force.
18	Wes Morriston	82.6	Analytic Philosophy	Uses the Euthyphro Dilemma to expose the redundancy and incoherence of divine command ethics.
19	Slavoj Žižek	81.2	Philosophy	Analyzes the "obscene" excess and "structural stupidity" of the divine character, justifying the need for a forensic audit.
20	John Stuart Mill	80.0	Liberalism	His Harm Principle is the primary source for the Omittoist transition "From Sin to Harm".

Omittoism - its own google website!

Finally, I have created Omittoism its own website, a google website:

https://sites.google.com/view/omittoism/home

Feel free to follow this page! 

So I am gonna stop posting about it here